Skip to content

Add Documentation for Replication Using a Load Balancer #2375

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 21, 2025

Conversation

cniackz
Copy link
Contributor

@cniackz cniackz commented Dec 24, 2024

Description:

Document a scenario where a load balancer terminates the connection during replication and provide guidance on how to resolve this issue.

ravindk89
ravindk89 previously approved these changes Dec 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@ravindk89 ravindk89 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM mod nit/suggestion

Copy link
Contributor

@allanrogerr allanrogerr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cniackz Is this only for replication or can be considered in other scenarios? It seems this is a general scenario.

Also, what is missing besides addressing the reviewers' comments?

Co-authored-by: Ravind Kumar <[email protected]>
@cniackz
Copy link
Contributor Author

cniackz commented Apr 15, 2025

@allanrogerr

Other scenarios can always emerge, of course, but this can definitely be considered a general one, not limited to replication.

As for what’s missing—nothing really. We can start from this and build on it as needed.

@cniackz cniackz dismissed allanrogerr’s stale review April 16, 2025 15:50

Allan needs to review again

@pjuarezd pjuarezd merged commit 4041c17 into master Apr 21, 2025
21 checks passed
@pjuarezd pjuarezd deleted the add-replication-docs branch April 21, 2025 20:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants